Should you prepay your home loan or invest the surplus? Get the real number — interest saved vs investment gain, with tax benefits factored in.
| Year | Opening Balance | Principal Paid | Interest Paid | Closing Balance (No Prepay) | Closing Balance (With Prepay) |
|---|
₹1.84 lakh crore sits unclaimed in India.
Because families didn't know where to look. Fix that in 10 minutes.
Every month, millions of Indian homeowners face the same question: if I have an extra ₹5 lakh lying around, should I dump it into my home loan or invest it in mutual funds? The internet is full of opinions. This calculator gives you the actual numbers — adjusted for your specific loan, investment expectations, and tax situation.
The short answer: at loan rates above 9%, prepayment almost always wins unless you have exceptional investment returns. At current rates of 8.5–9%, it's genuinely close — with equity mutual funds often edging out prepayment when tax benefits are considered. At rates below 8%, investing wins comfortably in most scenarios. But these averages hide the details that matter for your specific situation.
The interest rate on your home loan is not the same as the cost of the loan. Tax benefits transform the equation significantly:
On the investment side, equity mutual funds attract LTCG tax of 12.5% on gains above ₹1.25 lakh. A fund returning 14% CAGR pre-tax yields roughly 12.3% post-tax LTCG, which can still beat an effective loan cost of 8.5% × (1 - 0.30) = 5.95% for a let-out property. The gap narrows significantly when you account for market volatility and sequence risk.
Two sections of the Income Tax Act directly benefit home loan borrowers under the old regime:
When you make a large prepayment, you reduce your outstanding balance, which reduces future interest — and therefore reduces your future Section 24(b) deduction. For someone maximizing the ₹2L interest deduction, this is a real cost. In later years of the loan, when interest charged falls below ₹2L anyway, this consideration disappears.
The practical implication: prepaying aggressively in the first 5 years of a loan (when interest is high and the 24b deduction is fully utilized) forfeits significant tax benefits. Prepaying in the last 5–7 years (when interest is low anyway) forfeits little — and the principal reduction per rupee prepaid is most efficient.
Scenario: Rajan has a ₹50 lakh home loan at 8.5% with 15 years remaining. He has ₹5 lakh to spare. Should he prepay or invest?
If he prepays (reduce tenure): Interest saved ≈ ₹8.2 lakh. Loan closes ~18 months early.
If he invests at 12% CAGR for 15 years: FV ≈ ₹27.4L. After LTCG tax (12.5% on gains above ₹1.25L): post-tax FV ≈ ₹24.8L. Gain ≈ ₹19.8L gross, ~₹17.5L post-tax.
Verdict: Investing wins by ₹9.3L (₹17.5L gain vs ₹8.2L interest saved). But this assumes Rajan actually invests and doesn't touch the money for 15 years at a consistent 12% — both assumptions require discipline.
Break-even investment return: ~7.8% CAGR. If Rajan believes he can earn more than 7.8% post-tax, investing beats prepayment.
Prepayment wins when:
Investing wins when:
When you make a partial prepayment, most banks offer you two choices:
Reduce Tenure: Keep EMI the same, pay off the loan faster. This saves the most interest because the outstanding balance falls faster, compounding the savings. Always choose this if your cash flow allows. On a ₹50L loan at 8.5% with 15 years left, a ₹5L prepayment reduces tenure by approximately 1.5 years and saves ₹8.2L in interest.
Reduce EMI: Keep tenure the same, pay less each month. The interest savings are significantly lower (~40–50% less than tenure reduction). Choose this only if you genuinely need the cash flow relief — job uncertainty, business cash needs, family expense surge.
| Option | Monthly EMI | Interest Saved | Tenure Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Prepayment (₹50L, 8.5%, 15yr) | ~₹49,240 | — | 180 months |
| Prepay ₹5L — Reduce Tenure | ~₹49,240 (same) | ~₹8.2L | ~162 months |
| Prepay ₹5L — Reduce EMI | ~₹44,860 | ~₹4.1L | 180 months |